Volt Range Reflects Frigid Weather

2012 Chevrolet Volt Review

Chevrolet Volt

2012 Chevrolet Volt Review:

On the morning after I inadvertently left my pocket camera in the car outside overnight, when it was 10-below zero, it was still 5 below when I headed for an appointment the next morning. When I spotted the camera, I turned it on, and a little red light flashed at me that my fully-charged battery was down to nothing. I slid the camera into an inside pocket of my down parka, and went on my way.

A couple of hours later, I turned on the camera again, and — as if by magic — found that the battery had rejuvenated itself to full. I was impressed at its powers of recovery, and immediately, I wondered what would happen to the battery pack in a Chevrolet Volt in the same weather.

I was not test-driving a Chevrolet Volt that week, but I had been driving one a couple of weeks earlier. The Volt, of course, is Chevy’s impressive experiment in making a plug-in electric car, with a separate gas-engine backup. I wondered how severe cold might reduce the Volt’s battery-powered drive from its 50-mile range.

Chevy Volt

Volt styling is eye-catching and contemporary for the $40,000 4-door compact.

So far, it’s been a winterless winter, particularly in Northern Minnesota, where the occasional snowstorms that have hit Minneapolis and areas farther south have not reached as far as Duluth. In fact, they had to cancel this year’s John Beargrease Dogsled Marathon for a lack of snow. A dogsled is about the only vehicle that gets more “miles per gallon” than a Volt, or a Nissan Leaf, running pure electric power.

We did have a couple of normally frigid cold-snaps to contend with, between curiously warm, 30 and 40-ish temperatures. During one of those weeks, we had a glistening white Volt — the first electric vehicle I’ve been able to run through my normal test-drive routine. While normal Minnesotans are hardy enough to endure the worst winter can provide, I actually look forward to extremes of cold weather, snowfalls, and even ice-covered streets, in order to better test new vehicles in such adverse circumstances.

Our family routine each week-long road test is to drive normally for a couple of days in the Minneapolis area, then drive the sustained 165 miles north to Duluth, where we spend three days or so driving around the North Shore area of Lake Superior, and then back to Minneapolis. We had two cars that week, so my wife, Joan, and I drove them both northward. Joan set out a day ahead of me, in the Volt.

She parked the Volt in our garage, and plugged it in. Next morning, she called and said that she wondered if it was all worth it. “It was plugged in all night, and when I unplugged it and drove out, it said the car was fully charged, but was limited to 33 miles of electric range.”

Next day, I repeated the process. We drove the Volt 10 miles downtown, and around, and back home. I drove it into the garage, uncoiled the cable from the trunk, plugged it into the car’s left flank outlet, and into a normal wall socket inside the garage.

As I unplugged the Volt the next morning, it said, “Fully charged.” It also said I’d have a 33-mile limit to electric-drive range. I backed out of the garage, about 35 feet, then got out to close the garage door. It was 20 degrees above zero. When I climbed back into the Volt, the gauge said my remaining range was 32 miles. I had used one mile up by backing out of the garage. We drove to the end of the driveway, and the range had gone down to 31 miles. In our first block, we used up two miles of electric range.

Volt 250mpg, 0.007 gall

After draining battery power, Volt panel showed 250+ mpg.

One of the features of the Volt is that if you watch the gauges closely you can see when your electrical power is running down, and figure out when it makes the transition to gas-engine power. But otherwise, you can’t feel a thing when the battery-pack’s juice runs out and the car switches to gas-engine power. So I wasn’t sure if I got my “full” 30 miles out of the battery’s charge, which was reduced by at least 10 from its warm-weather maximum, presumably by the chilly, 20-above, weather.

That’s why the comparison to the battery in my little Lumix camera came to mind. Wouldn’t it be great if, after severe cold lessens the range of an electric car, it might be “warmed up” to rejuvenate its electrical supply?

For car-buyers who drive 10 miles to work and 10 miles back, or less, the Volt would be an intriguing purchase, because you could charge it fully overnight at home, then make it to work and back home without ever using a drop of gasoline for the accompanying 1.4-liter 4-cylinder engine. The nice part is that if you did have to go farther, for an emergency, or whatever, the gas engine kicks in like a safety net to get you where you’re going.

For anyone who might want to drive as far as Minneapolis to Duluth, or back, on a fairly regular basis, the Volt becomes more of a challenge. As it is, you can get about 35-38 miles per gallon, which isn’t bad, but that includes getting the first 33 free, on electric power, but less than 40 mpg for a combined 150- mile trip from Duluth to Minneapolis.

The Volt is enjoyable to drive, accelerating swiftly to highway speed with a combined 149 horsepower and 273 foot-pounds of torque, fed through a continuously variable transmission. Its comparatively heavy frame feels well-planted, and the suspension offers a firm stability in cornering. Electric power steering works well, even if the steering feedback feel is a little vague. The interior amenities are impressive. Nice instrument layout, and well-done specialty instruments that you can summon with the right switches to monitor whatever you might want to check on.

For example, starting out with a full charge and taking it easy, I drove 29.5 miles before noticing the system had shifted from electric to gas. I clicked on the right page, and it showed that of the 27.9 miles, I had covered 27.9 by all-electric, and only 1.6 miles on the gas engine. That meant I had used up all the stored electrical energy, and 0.07 gallons of gasoline. The computer said that registered as “250+” miles per gallon.

Very impressive. Even if driving 120 miles more lowered that computerized number to 37.5 mpg.

Chevy Volt interior review

Interior layout of Volt is contemporary, easy to operate.

Decent interior room and trunk space make the Volt a worthy family car, but it comes back again to whether you want to pay the $40,000-range price for a compact sedan that gets 37 mpg anytime you want to venture beyond the electric range of 40 miles. Or, 33.

“I like everything about the Volt,” said Joan. “It looks good on the outside, and the interior is very nice. The seats are good and the power and handling are good enough.

“But I’m afraid I would find it more convenient to just drive it like a normal car, without the inconvenience of plugging it in. When you’re going to drive 165 miles, it almost doesn’t seem worth it to plug it in all night and pay whatever that works out to be for electricity, for only 33 miles. I’d probably get in the habit of driving it and liking it as a normal little car, without going to the trouble of plugging it in every night.”

That, of course, defeats the purpose of spending extra money for a Volt, even with a government kickback to reduce the $40,000 sticker by $7,500. There are a number of lighter and more agile sedans on the market that will deliver 35-40 mpg for half that price.

Our test week was concluded before the government test issue came along, where crash-testing a Volt and then leaving it with other crashed cars led to a fire. There have been other fires, apparently traced to the electrical plug in system, or to damage from accidents. Further tests haven’t disclosed any apparent evidence about why those fires occurred.

One of the main features of the Volt when it was introduced a year ago was that it was not a hybrid. Even though it has a gasoline engine, that engine is only used to move the Volt after the electrical power has been exhausted. A hybrid, typically, runs on power from electric motors that are recharged by the on board gasoline engine. When stepped on hard, the gas engine power can supplement the electric power, but the main thing is that in normal use, the gas engine recharges the battery pack for, in essence, free power.

It seems it would be the ultimate irony if the easiest fix for the Volt’s potential electrical fires might be to alter the combination engine/motor to turn it into a hybrid. Interesting idea, because going 33-40 miles on “free” electric power and then switching to the 30-something of the gas engine is less enticing to me than a vehicle that runs on electric power and extends its own electric range by recharging itself with free power from the gas engine.

Volt plug in

Coiled power cord fits in trunk, plugs into outlet on Volt's flank.

With virtually every manufacturer in the world introducing or working on electric cars, an interesting comparison arose out of the first year of the Volt, which was accompanied in time by the Nissan Leaf, a pure-electric vehicle with a range of 100 miles on a full charge and with no gas engine for backup.

In their first year on the market, with both companies trying to expand the regions where they first sold their electric cars, Motor Trend reported that through October, 5,003 Volts were sold, compared to 8,066 Leafs (Leaves?) — even though Nissan has spent far less on marketing and advertising for the Leaf. It would appear that those who live close enough to work, or wherever their daily driving takes them, might find the Volt appealing, and the Leaf possibly a better alternative, with its lower price of $34,000 before incentive rebates, to the Volt’s $39,995, plus much greater range of 100 miles to 40 for the Volt.

I’ve driven the Leaf, but only at the car’s introduction, where it showed surprisingly good performance — zooming silently up to and over 90 miles per hour with my co-driver at the helm. I haven’t gotten one for a week’s test of my own yet. One of the reasons might be that it would require being trucked up from the press fleet in Chicago to Minnesota, or else face four long layovers for recharging.

For my personal test, I would have to alter my norm, or else drive the car for a couple of days around Minneapolis, then head for Duluth, stopping two times for several hours each for recharging — a long, long lunch, perhaps? — before making it to Duluth on three full charges.

As far as my family is concerned, hybrids make a lot more efficient and economic sense. Impressive as everything is about driving the Volt, when Chevrolet introduced it, the Chevy PR machine stressed: “This is not a science project.” A year later, it occurs to me, that’s exactly what the Volt is.

Having already witnessed the dropoff in electric battery power when it is down to 20 degrees above, the drop in mileage range might be considerably more severe when it goes to 10 or 15 below zero, even if you keep your Volt in a garage, preferably a heated garage, every night, and also keep it indoors at work.

Last time I checked, even if warming the car up like I did my camera were possible, Eddie Bauer doesn’t make a down jacket big enough to cover a Volt.

Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


See New Car Inventory on CarSoup.com | See Used Car Inventory on CarSoup.com

5 Comments

  1. @bobbleheadguru
    Posted January 24, 2012 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Thanks for the comprehensive article.

    A few points that I hope are helpful:

    1. You can preheat the Volt without plugging in and use only electricity without limiting the range. My range has varied from 41 miles down to about 24. I have had my Volt since late September.

    2. An average commuter drives 12-15K miles per year. On average that is 33-41 miles per day. Most people commute in a regular finite range most days, then occasionally drive on long trips.

    So the Volt is in the sweet spot for most drivers. In fact, the average MPG for Volt drivers according to the real data collected on VoltStats.net is well over 100MPG. Mileage without electric charging is in practice very rare.

    3. Plugging in the Volt is a 20 second effort/charge. This effort is more than worth it compared to going to a gas pump more often (a 10 minute effort). The analytic displays in the Volt are so prominent that is very hard to forget to plug it in.

    4. Approximately 8000 Volts have been sold. The car has only been released nationally since November 1, 2011. (about 83 days). In terms of vehicle availability, it is just at the starting line.

    For both the Volt and the Leaf, the supply v. demand question is still an unknown.

    5. Though the vehicle has a price of $40K MSRP, it is virtually impossible NOT to get the tax incentive. The $33K effective price is only $3K more than the average MSRP of new vehicles. When looking at the car that way, it actually very cost effective.

    In my case, I am leasing the car. I got the incentive indirectly as it was collected by US Bank (my leasing company) and was applied to my down payment. My lease rate per month is higher than the new version of my old car. However, it is almost offset by the lower fuel costs, even including electricity. Bottom line: More to payment, less to BP, Exxon and Shell.

  2. Tom
    Posted January 27, 2012 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    I’m in complete agreement with bobbleheadguru

    Plugging in the car is actually more convenient than plugging in my new smart phone and I have to plug that in every night.

    The final cost (after rebate) was quite a bit less than my truck, which shlucks gas down by the gulp-full.

    The problems with the Volt as I see it are that most people figure out that it’s most efficient to drive with the car in the low transmission setting. This puts the car into a fairly aggressive regenerative braking mode when your foot’s not on the accelerator. The problem is that the deceleration comes without brake lights and people behind you get caught by surprise.

    The second problem is that the car should have a battery warmer option that keeps them at optimal temperature while plugged in. That would extend the range of the car for at least half of the commute because the temperature would be maintained just through battery usage during driving.

    My wife and I are really having fun with the Volt. We’ve had it since October and like its features, ride, driving, and looks. Oh, the 100 mpg also doesn’t hurt. I’ve been thinking about trading in the Corolla and getting a second one. Why not? Electric is cheap.

  3. Adam
    Posted March 18, 2012 at 1:29 am | Permalink

    The “Joke” another scam delivered by Great American brain washing machinery !
    Yea so called hybrids or now electric cars, with an idea to burn more gas and feed the oil companies Monsters.

    Monster is Arab oil companies who owe American politicians. (yea it’s hard to believe) but it’s true!

    Why no one asks for efficient diesels, have you people ever been anywhere in the world? Europiens drive diesels that in average deliver 50+ mpg and they don’t impact environment as American media will tell
    you, another Arab oil companies lie…also it doesn’t cost extra $10k to build efficient diesel engine American car companies lie, well diesels last easily 3 times longer then gasoline powered cars….hmmm I wonder why are they lying to the consumers…
    Well neither Arab oil companies ir American car companies nor anyone else care about American consumer.

    This why!

  4. AR
    Posted April 1, 2012 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    Adam

    I couldn’t agree any more! I just was checking out some Europien car sites and found out that vehicles offered in Europe in average deliver 3 times better efficiency, including American car manufacturers such as ford who is major player in European car market , ford offers same car model fired fiesta on US market barely can get 40 mpg on hwy and the same vehicle is offered on European market with 50%+ more efficient engine, it gets close to 70mpg per galon.

    Why?

  5. Tom
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Um, I think we’re getting a little off-topic here, but as long as we’re here. The Euro versions of the cars you’re talking about are all diesels. Also, the standards for determining the mileage use are different. 1) Imperial gallon being used, which is 20% larger than a U.S. gallon. 2) The test that’s used to determine mileage is different: they use the European Circuit, which generally delivers high mileage numbers than the U.S. standards test. 3) Euro cars are made with smaller engines that deliver significantly poorer performance. For example: http://www.autoweek.com/article/20110406/GREEN/110409933 will give you the example of a Ford Focus that states the numbers that you have and then explains how that relates to U.S. numbers.

    I can clearly state that our last tank of gas in the Volt returned 144 miles per gallon. That was a bit low because of some really long road trips, but still not bad. That was on real Minnesota roads, running the car through 39 mile round trip commutes, 5 days per week. We also use the car as our family car on the weekend, which is where we seem to burn the most gas.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.

Connect with Facebook

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>